Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Arkansas Gloria's column >>

ARKANSAS GLORIA

Articles Posted: 17  Links Seeded: 172
Member Since: 1/2009  Last Seen: 2/22/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Hanford Site - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Seeded on Wed Oct 19, 2011 1:14 AM EDT
Read ArticleArticle Source: wikipedia
world-news, war, japan, electricity, nevada, nuclear-energy, nuclear-war, chernobyl, yucca-mountain, nagasaki, nuclear-reactors, hydro-electric-plants, three-mile-island-obyl
Seeded by Arkansas Gloria
Advertise | AdChoices

QUESTION:  DO WE AS A NATION WANT TO CONTINUE TO USE AND DEVELOP NUCLEAR POWER?

 In this article, these processors were built in just over 1 year, many of them.  The HALF-LIFE one waste at the Hanford Site is 24,100 years.  The HALF LIFE.  

As an example, plutonium has a half-life of 24,100 years, and a decay of ten half-lives is required before a sample is considered to be safe.

The most significant challenge at Hanford is stabilizing the 53 million U.S. gallons (204,000 m3) of high-level radioactive waste stored in 177 underground tanks. About a third of these tanks have leaked waste into the soil and groundwater.

As of 2008, 1 million U.S. gallons (4,000 m3) of highly radioactive waste is traveling through the groundwater toward the Columbia River. This waste is expected to reach the river in 12 to 50 years if cleanup does not proceed on schedule.  

The Department of Energy is currently building a vitrification plant on the Hanford Site. Vitrification is a method designed to combine these dangerous wastes with glass to render them stable. Bechtel, the San Francisco based construction and engineering firm, has been hired to construct the vitrification plant, which is currently estimated to cost approximately $12 billion. Construction began in 2001. After some delays, the plant is now scheduled to be operational in 2019, with vitrification completed in 2047. It was originally scheduled to be operational by 2011, with vitrification completed by 2028.

In early 2008, a $600 million cut to the Hanford cleanup budget was proposed.

 simple understanding of the situation:

  • " Nuclear energy relies on the fact that some elements can be split (in a process called fission) and will release part of their energy as heat.
  • Because it fissions easily, Uranium-235 (U-235) is one of the elements most commonly used to produce nuclear energy. It is generally used in a mixture with Uranium-238, and produces Plutonium-239 (Pu-239) as waste in the process.
  • A nuclear power plant generates electricity like any other steam-electric power plant. Water is heated, and steam from the boiling water turns turbines and generates electricity.
  • The main difference in the various types of steam-electric plants is the heat source. Coal, oil, or gas is burned in other power plants to heat the water. Heat from a chain reaction of fissioning Uranium-235 boils the water in a nuclear power plant. Some have compared this process to using a canon to kill a fly. " quoted, written by:

by Leslie Lai & Kristen Morrison, Nuclear Energy Fact Sheet, of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation.  

Also, the requirements for nuclear sites has been changed.  Originally, it was to be in a REMOTE AREA, away from civilization, and had requirements that needed to be met, such as:..The ideal site...A large and remote tract of land, ...A "hazardous manufacturing area", ..No towns of more than 1,000 people closer than 20 miles (32 km) from the hazardous rectangle, ...No main highway, railway, or employee village closer than 10 miles (16 km) from the hazardous rectangle, ..A large electric power supply, ...Ground that could bear heavy loads, and finally, the clincher:  A clean and abundant water supply  . 


SAY THAT AGAIN:  A CLEAN AND ABUNDANT WATER SUPPLY


THE HANFORD SITE, UNDER THE DIRECTION OF United States government...Army Corps of Engineers, placed the newly formed Manhattan Project under the command of General Leslie R. Groves  IN 1942....
The federal government quickly acquired the land under its eminent domain authority and relocated some 1,500 residents of Hanford, White Bluffs, and nearby settlements, as well as the Wanapum and other tribes using the area.

  •  In the year 2000, an estimated 310 tons (620,000 pounds) of civilian, weapons-usable plutonium had been produced.
  • Less than 8 kilograms (about 18 pounds) of plutonium is enough for one Nagasaki-type bomb. Thus, in the year 2000 alone, enough plutonium was created to make more than 34,000 nuclear weapons.   
  • Do we want that?
  • WHAT IS THE REAL PRICE WE PAY FOR THIS NUCLEAR ENERGY?
    • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

    Published to:

    • Arkansas Gloria's Column, All of Newsvine
    • Groups: Centervine, Free Thinkers, Newsvine HONOR Vine, rightwingers
    • Regions: none
    • Public Discussion (2)
    Arkansas Gloria

    In the Republican National Debate today, Yucca Mountain was discussed, and presidential candidates were asked how they feel about using Yucca Mountain as a 'waste dump'? Then, I came on this article...http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-republicans-want-dirtier-air-dirtier-water

    OBAMA: REPUBLICANS WANT "DIRTIER AIR", DIRTIER WATER, on CNN news.

    “The Republican plan says that what’s been standing in the way between us and full employment are laws that keep companies from polluting as much as they want,” Obama said...

    I propose that the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS NO PROBLEM ABOUT POLLUTING WHENEVER AND WHERE EVER IT DEEMS. I resent Obama using such an attack on a political party, and as part of a campaign speech, hidden as a Jobs act, and using such language obviously to anger and divide. That is not going to work, and coming up with solutions. It is designed to point fingers and try to depict blame, when the real problem here is MONEY. Where is it, where did it go, who has it, and why did they take it?

    I connected this article from Wikipedia, MAINLY due to one sentence:

    In early 2008, a $600 million cut to the Hanford cleanup budget was proposed. Washington state officials expressed concern about the budget cuts, as well as missed deadlines and recent safety lapses at the site, and threatened to file a lawsuit alleging that the Department of Energy is in violation of environmental laws.

    Today, Hanford is the most contaminated nuclear site in the United States. Budget cuts in 2008, are the culprit in:

    The budget cuts may be particularly hard felt at large cleanup sites such as Washington State's Hanford Nuclear Site, the most contaminated nuclear site in the country, the article suggests. Some officials fear that the cuts could delay cleanup of Hanford and other sites indefinitely. from ScienceDaily , and : American Chemical Society (March 10, 2008). Article Title: Funding Cuts jeopardize Cleanup of nuclear Waste, Sites., from EurekAlert!



    • 2 votes
    Reply#1 - Wed Oct 19, 2011 2:11 AM EDT
    Arkansas Gloria

    Money. Again, the demise of the United States, and the continued attempt to keep spending, will have numerous side effects, many of which we won't even be made aware of. Were we informed of the changes that made the Real Estate Bubble particularly dangerous, or did those officials that haven't been brought to trial yet, keep all information to themselves?

    We, the people, are always the last to know. TIME FOR A BALANCED BUDGET AMENDMENT.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#2 - Wed Oct 19, 2011 2:16 AM EDT
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
    Newsvine Privacy Statement
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    FUN STUFF:
    • Leaderboard |
    • E-Mail Alerts |
    • Top of the Vine |
    • Newsvine Live |
    • Newsvine Archives |
    • The Greenhouse |
    COMPANY STUFF:
    • Code of Honor |
    • Company Info |
    • Contact Us |
    • Jobs |
    • User Agreement |
    • Privacy Policy |
    • About our ads
    LEGAL STUFF:
    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com